Formant indicators of «velarization». Part II
https://doi.org/10.25587/2782-6627-2024-2-46-57
Abstract
In this paper, the study of the problem of determining velarization from acoustic data and its relationship to articulation continues. The purpose of the study is to identify different types of “velarization”, their articulation and acoustic description. In the course of the study, the methods used at the V.M. Nadelyaev LFEI of the sector of languages of the peoples of Siberia of the IFL SB RAS (Novosibirsk), as well as in the LEFI of the Department of Foreign Languages of the AmSU (Blagoveshchensk). The object of the study is dynamic speech. The subject of the study is “velarization” in languages of different families. The material for the analysis was static and somatic MRI scans and audio recordings recorded at different times by employees (including the author of this work) of the V.M. Nadelyaev LEFI, made on time and after tomography from the appropriate media. Scientific novelty and theoretical significance of the study: the correlation between F2, articulation and auditory perception of amplifying articulation of hardness – “velarization” is presented for the first time. The materials and results of the research can be used to develop textbooks on general phonetics, at seminars on dynamic speech analysis, and when writing scientific articles on experimental phonetics. The main conclusions presented in this paper are: 1) analysis of somatic material revealed two types of “velarization”: with a deflection on the front of the back of the tongue (“coarsening” of the consonant is stronger) and without; 2) in “velarized” consonants, the graduated opposition to the rise of the back of the tongue is indifferent.
About the Author
N. S. UrtegeshevRussian Federation
URTEGESHEV Nikolay Sergeevich – Doctor of Philology, leading researcher, Laboratory of Experimental Phonetic Research, Department of Foreign Languages; Chief Researcher of the Department of Northern Philology
Blagoveshchensk
Yakutsk
References
1. Urtegeshev NS. Formant indicators of «velarization». Part I. Altaistics, 2004;1(12):48-60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.25587/2782-6627-2024-1-48-60 (Accessed: 11.04.2014). (In Russ.)
2. Urtegeshev NS. Somatic parameters of vowel settings: a method for determining the stages of separation. Turkology, 2009;3-4(41-42):3-12. (In Russ.)
3. Urtegeshev NS. The structure of the tongue in the oral cavity as an additional articulation of vowels. Siberian Philological Journal, 2023;1:226–242. (In Russ.)
4. Seliutina IIa. Introduction to general phonetics: a textbook. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University, 2008. (In Russ.)
5. Nadeliaev VM. The Universal Unified Phonetic Transcription (UUFT). Moscow–Leningrad, 1960. (In Russ.)
6. Nadeliaev VM. Articulation classification of vowels. Phonetic studies in Siberian languages. Novosibirsk, 1980:3-43. (In Russ.)
7. Morozova ON. Paradigmatics and syntagmatics of the sound systems of the Tungusic languages of the Upper Amur region (based on the material of the Evenk and Orochon languages). Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philology / Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2021. (In Russ.)
8. Kodzasov SV, Krivnova OF. General phonetics. Moscow. 2001. (In Russ.)
9. Urtegeshev NS, Seliutina IIa, Esenbaeva GA еt al. Phonetic transcription standards of UUFT and MFA: a system of correspondences. Questions of philology. The series «Ural-Altai studies», 2009;1(1):100-115. (In Russ.)
10. Bondarko LV. Velarization. Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary. [Online]. Available from: http://tapemark.narod.ru/les/082c.html (Accessed: December 28, 2022). (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Urtegeshev N.S. Formant indicators of «velarization». Part II. Altaistics. 2024;(2):46-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/2782-6627-2024-2-46-57