Preview

Altaistics

Advanced search

On Verb Enantiosemy in Khakas

https://doi.org/10.25587/2782-6627-2024-4-54-62

Abstract

In the following article, we demonstrate usage and formation of contronyms using verb semantics as examples. Our purpose is to determine the main patterns of semantic development of polysemic verbs in Khakas on the basis of formation of opposite meanings in verb structures. We use a system of methods including description, interpretation, and classification of materials, as well as lexicographic methods, analysis of components and ф contextual analysis. Contronymic verbs are taken from dictionaries, literary fiction, mass media, folklore texts, as well as oral Khakas speech. We analyze around 100 polysemic verbs with contronymic meanings. The relevance of our study stems from the fact that Khakas enantiosemy has not yet been thoroughly researched; in particular, verb enantiosemy in Khakas (as well as Siberian Turkic languages in general) is described for the first time, ensuring the novelty of our project. We describe contronymic verbs, ways of formation of contronymy in polysemic verbs, semantic types of contronymic meanings, namely genus enantiosemy, contextual enantiosemy, enantiosemy of compatibility, and conversion enantiosemy. Our materials and research results may be used in textbooks on Khakas lexicology, in further studies of semantics, word structures, and theoretical issues of asymmetry of signs. We demonstrate that in Khakas, enantiosemy emerges as a result of various processes resulting in contronymic meanings within words.

About the Author

O. Yu. Shagdurova
Khakas Research Institute of Language, Literature and History
Russian Federation

SHAGDUROVA Ol’ga Yurievna – Cand. Sci. (Philology), Senior Researcher, Sector of the Languages

Abakan



References

1. Scherzl VI. About words with opposite meanings (or about the so-called enantiosemia). Voronezh; 1884:83. (in Russian)

2. Batsevich FS. Technology of enantiosemic meanings of verbs in modern Russian. In: Vasilyev LМ. (ed.) Research on semantics. Ufa, 1986;12:33–40. (in Russian)

3. Makhmutova LR. The main types of enantiosemia in modern Russian. Summary of Candidate’s dissertation (Philology). Kazan: Kazan State University, 2009. (in Russian)

4. Markova EM. On the causes and manifestations of enantiosemia in the Russian language in the inter-Slavic aspect. Bulletin of the N.I. Lobachevsky Nizhny Novgorod University, 2010;4(2):631–635. (in Russian)

5. Litvinova EA. Emotional-evaluative enantiosemia. Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 2012;2(13):86–90. (in Russian)

6. Sadchikova IV. Enantiosemy as a way of coexistence of opposite evaluative components in the semantics of a word: Proceedings of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2009;11;4(5): 1306–1310. (in Russian)

7. Ostrikova GN. Enantiosemy of multilevel units of the German language: structural-semantic, functional and typological aspects. Summary of Doctoral dissertation (Philology). Rostov-on-Don, 2014. (in Russian)

8. Brodsky MY. Lexical enantiosemy in a comparative aspect: based on the material of modern English and French languages. Summary of Candidate’s dissertation (Philology). Yekaterinburg, 1998. (in Russian)

9. Kuznetsova AI. The phenomenon of enantiosemia in the Uralic languages: the case of Komi, Nenets, and Selkup languages. In: Burkova SI. (ed.). Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific Conference on Self-study. Dedicated to the 100th anniversary of G. D. Verbov and the 75th anniversary of Y. N. Popova, 26–28 October, 2010, Novosibirsk, Russia. Novosibirsk: Lyubava; 2010:135–143. (in Russian)

10. Budagova ZI. On verbal enantiosemia in the Azerbaijani language. In: Khodzhiev AP. (ed.) Turkic linguistics: Proceedings of the 3d All-Union Turkological Conference. Tashkent: Fan; 1985:323–327. (in Russian)

11. Osmonalieva DK. Enantiosemy in the Kyrgyz language. Summary of Candidate’s dissertation (Philology). Bishkek, 2007. (in Russian)

12. Orozalieva D. Emotionally expressive enantiosemia in the Kyrgyz and Turkish languages. Bulletin of ALATOO ACADEMIC STUDIES, 2016;2:96–101. (in Russian)

13. Sydykova TK. The role of enantiosemia in the poetry of Barna Alykulova. National Association of Scientists (NAU), 2016;3(19):135–136. (in Russian)

14. Odilov ER. Enantiosemy in the Uzbek language. Summary of Doctoral dissertation (Philology). Tashkent, 2016. (in Uzbek)

15. Gorelov IN. Enantiosemia as a collision of contradictory trends in linguistic development. Questions of Linguistics, 1986;4:86–96. (in Russian)

16. Nuralieva KZ. The ability of phraseological units to enantiosemia. Bulletin of the A.S. Pushkin Leningrad State University. Vol. 1. Philology, 2011;2:95–98. Available from: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?ysclid=m47w7diwiq697988823&id=17849016 [Accessed 10 November 2024]. (in Russian)

17. Kravtsova VYu. Enantiosemy of lexical and phraseological units: language and speech. Summary of Candidate’s dissertation (Philology). Volgograd: Rostov State Pedagogical University, 2006. (in Russian)

18. Kolesnikova OP. Enantiosemy of syntactic constructions (based on the material of the German language). Summary of Candidate’s dissertation (Philology). Maykop: Adygea State University, 2022. (in Russian)

19. Dzhumabayeva Zh., Murodova N. Cognitive signs of enantiosemia in multi-system languages. Foreign Philology: Language, Literature, Education, 2018;3:43–47. Available from: https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/foreign_philology/article/view/837 [Accessed 10 November 2024]. (in Russian)

20. Muminov VI. Ways of expressing the hidden polarization of meanings within one linguistic unit in the works of A.P. Chekhov. Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series: History and Philology, 2019;29;2:266–273. (in Russian)

21. Murodova NI. Historical prerequisites for the study of enantiosemia in English, Russian and Uzbek linguistics. Farg’ona Davlat Universiteti, 2019;5:122–126. Available from: https://journal.fdu.uz/index.php/sjfsu/article/view/541 [Accessed 10 November 2024]. (in Russian)

22. Avdeeva MD., Yaroslavtseva EF., Garaeva MV. Lexical enantiosemy as a linguistic aspect of the category of contrarity (based on the material of Germanic and Slavic language groups). Philological Sciences. Questions of Theory and Practice, 2019;12;8:226–232. Available from: https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2019.8.44 [Accessed 10 November 2024]. (in Russian)

23. Baskakov NA. (ed.) Grammar of the Khakas language. Moscow: Nauka, 1975:418. (in Russian)

24. Nikitin MV. Lexical meaning in a word and a phrase. Vladimir, 1974:220. (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Shagdurova O.Yu. On Verb Enantiosemy in Khakas. Altaistics. 2024;(4):54-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25587/2782-6627-2024-4-54-62

Views: 66


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-6627 (Online)